[Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418





--- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org>  2009-04-14 03:04:02 EDT ---
missing Rs:
pexpect (for ssh)
curlftpfs (for ftp)

missing conflict:
sbackup


> So does nssbackup actually work without the gtk subpackage? 
yeah, it should be!

Description: NSsbackup Common files package
NSsbackup common files package. This package is not the software itself 
but contains the minimum set of files to make it run.


> Does it work without ftp and ssh subpackages?
yes!

Description: NSsbackup Fuse SSH plugin
NSsbackup SSH plugin. This package will permit to have the ability
to make backups from and over an SSH location. This plugin use FUSE file
systems.

Description: NSsbackup Fuse FTP/SFTP plugin 
NSsbackup FTP and SFTP plugin. This package will permit to have the ability
to make backups from and over FTP/SFTP location. This plugin use FUSE file
systems.


> Do the ftp and ssh subpackages bring new huge dependencies?
ftp: curlftpfs (currently missing)
ssh: sshfs, pexpect (currently missing)


> And if ftp and ssh do not introduce a huge
> dependency and the gtk interface is always needed, 
> I would say one package fits completely.
You are a fan of splitting it? I'm not a fan of it, because ftp and ssh
shouldn't be excluded as seperate modules and there is only one frontend. If
there are 2 frontends for example i would split it in 3 packages, common with
ftp and ssh support and in the guis gtk and qt.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.