[Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231





--- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>  2009-08-14 13:11:26 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Thanks for the precision, Spot. I'll do it very soon.
> But I wonder how to name and/or version the package, since this case is not
> listed in the package naming guidelines, and the packaged tarball will not
> match upstream's. I can imagine commenting the spec file like in the CVS
> snapshot case, but it is nether a prerelease, nor a postrelease (in fact, it is
> a custom release)... Can you help me on this topic ? Thank you.  

So, what you need to do is this:

Take the tarball upstream provides and unpack it. Then, remove the files which
we do not have permission to redistribute, and then make a new tarball with the
same basename as the upstream tarball, but append "-clean" to the end of it.
Finally, in the spec file, refer to the -clean tarball (without a URL), and add
comments that point to the original upstream tarball and how you generated the
new -clean tarball:

# The upstream tarball contains icons which we could not determine the
licensing # for. The original source was found here: http://foo.bar/baz.tar.gz
# To generate the clean tarball, run:
# tar xvfz baz.tar.gz
# rm -rf baz/icons/*.png
# tar cvfz baz-clean.tar.gz baz/
Source: baz-clean.tar.gz

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.