[Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231





--- Comment #21 from Patrick Monnerat <pm at datasphere.ch>  2009-08-14 13:29:20 EDT ---
Thanks Spot, but this was the "clear" part, and my question was not!

My question is about package NAMING: is is a fourth case (after prerelease,
snapshot and postrelease) where the %release should contain a specific alpha
string ? (AFAIK, these are the only kind of packages that are allowed to
contain a main tarball that is not directly downloadable from upstream). Or do
I keep the regular package naming, breaking the "downloadable from upstream"
rule ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.