[Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337


Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2009-12-02 11:17:48 EDT ---
Some notes:

? Requires
  - Would you explain the necessity of "R: rubygem(rake)"?
    ( Maybe for lib/rcov/rcovtask.rb ? If so, I wonder if this
      script is used by default or not because no other scripts
      in rcov gem seems to require this script )

  ! Note that I am not objecting to adding "R: rubygem(rake)".

* ext/
  - Files under ext/ are to generate C extension module
    (rcovrt.so) and should not be needed to be included into
    binary rpm.

    ( The trouble is that once we try to execute "rake check"
      under %geminstdir, rake task tries to regenerate .so file.

      In such cases files under ext/ are needed, however anyway
      this won't work but for root because write permission for
      %geminstdir is needed.
      So while you may want to add files under ext to -doc
      subpackage, these files should not be in main package. )

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.