[Bug 548694] Review Request: python-rpmfluff - Lightweight way of building RPMs, and sabotaging them
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Dec 18 13:40:59 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548694
James Laska <jlaska at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jlaska at redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from James Laska <jlaska at redhat.com> 2009-12-18 08:40:57 EDT ---
= rpmlint =
$ rpmlint python-rpmfluff-0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm
python-rpmfluff.src: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint python-rpmfluff-0.3-1.fc12.noarch.rpm
python-rpmfluff.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
The above is more of a warning and not something I would expect to cause issue.
= general specfile formatting =
I've made some minor formatting corrections based on the feedback I've always
received from my package reviews. I don't think this is a requirement, but
might help.
See the changes at ... http://pastie.org/748652
= license =
The spec file lists GPLv2, but there is no LICENSE file in the source or %doc.
Perhaps someone else can speak to that.
= copyright =
The rpmfluff.py file has no copyright preamble. Should one be added?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list