[Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226





--- Comment #10 from Pavel Alexeev <pahan at hubbitus.spb.su>  2009-02-22 18:06:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> > No, duedlines say what CVS, not released versions must start from 0.
> Definitely, I can't agree.
> Version 0.9 have been published on 2006-06-06
> So this is a post-release version
> Read :
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
Ok, you are right. Version release enumaration changed.

> I prefer using %{name}.xml rather than %{peclName}.xml (or %{peclName}2.xml)
> (see recent approved changes in PHP Guidelines, this is to avoid possible
> conflicts between pecl, pear and other channel extensions).
Ok, let it be so.

> I need to search if %verify(not md5 mtime size) is acceptable in the
> Guidelines...
> 
> Is the spec encoding ok ? It seems there is UTF-8 (ru sumnary) and ISO (pl
> sumnary) which make my text editor crazy ?
Polish summary and description recoded from iso8859-2 to UTF-8. 

> $ file php-pecl-runkit.spec 
> php-pecl-runkit.spec: Non-ISO extended-ASCII text, with LF, NEL line
> terminators
Now:
$ file php-pecl-runkit.spec
php-pecl-runkit.spec: UTF-8 Unicode text


http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/php-pecl-runkit/php-pecl-runkit-0.9-7.CVS20090215.fc9.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.