[Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Feb 23 20:37:24 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727





--- Comment #10 from Matthew Truch <matt at truch.net>  2009-02-23 15:37:23 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Please bump & post your spec and srpm for each modification you make. It is
> easier to track.

Sorry, forgot to do that.  They're at:
http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata.spec
http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata-2.6.1b-3.fc11.src.rpm

> (In reply to comment #7)
> > As for upstream, they do not want to change how they do the sonames as they
> > claim that Debian requires it the way they do it.
> Shared libraries should have a proper versioned soname. I really doubt Debian
> forbids that.
> http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/shared-libraries.html
> 
> You can make one but problems will appear in case upstream decides on a
> different scheme later on.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#no-soname
> Starting with .0 for major is the best way. I still think you should insist on
> proper soname upstream.

I have told them upstream, and I think they will with the next release.  For
now I have .0 as you suggest.  I think it's now kosher wrt sonames, please let
me know otherwise.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list