[Bug 498604] Review Request: apron - Abstract numerical domain library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jul 9 16:19:50 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498604





--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2009-07-09 12:19:48 EDT ---
Just a few comments:

No parallel make?  Sure would go faster on my lots-of-cores builder.  If it
doesn't work you should at least add a comment indicating that.

I'm having trouble understanding the reasoning here:
> The first category of warnings are all about inclusion of libraries in the 
> main package. Ostensibly, the whole purpose of the apron package is these 
> libraries, so I was not sure of whether these belong in -devel.

So here's my question: What good are the static libraries without the headers
in the -devel package?  Static libraries have no runtime use at all; they'll be
embedded into executables at build time

The guidelines on static libraries should be pretty clear:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries
They should be in a separate -static package unless you really have no shared
libraries at all, in which case they can be in -devel but you must still
provide the -static symbol so that other packages can BuildRequires:
apron-static.

The prelink file confuses me.  Why is it in the main package?  Actually, why is
anything at all in the main package?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list