[Bug 498604] Review Request: apron - Abstract numerical domain library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jul 9 19:10:23 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498604
--- Comment #2 from Alan Dunn <amdunn at gmail.com> 2009-07-09 15:10:22 EDT ---
Thanks for the comments.
(In reply to comment #1)
> Just a few comments:
>
> No parallel make? Sure would go faster on my lots-of-cores builder. If it
> doesn't work you should at least add a comment indicating that.
I didn't look at this, so I'll see what I can do about allowing this.
> I'm having trouble understanding the reasoning here:
> > The first category of warnings are all about inclusion of libraries in the
> > main package. Ostensibly, the whole purpose of the apron package is these
> > libraries, so I was not sure of whether these belong in -devel.
>
> So here's my question: What good are the static libraries without the headers
> in the -devel package? Static libraries have no runtime use at all; they'll be
> embedded into executables at build time
>
> The guidelines on static libraries should be pretty clear:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries
> They should be in a separate -static package unless you really have no shared
> libraries at all, in which case they can be in -devel but you must still
> provide the -static symbol so that other packages can BuildRequires:
> apron-static.
> The prelink file confuses me. Why is it in the main package?
You're right - this should go in ocaml-apron.
> Actually, why is anything at all in the main package?
Well, I would think the few minor documentation files (since they are probably
not enough to comprise a whole doc subpackage) could go there.
I can certainly move all the static libraries to the devel subpackage, it just
seemed odd to put these in apron-devel as the purpose of the whole package is
already for development. I saw the guidelines, I just thought another opinion
might be in order nonetheless. I'll just move the files to devel as long as
it's okay to have essentially an empty main package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list