[Bug 497833] Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jul 13 14:34:20 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833
--- Comment #3 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme at redhat.com> 2009-07-13 10:34:19 EDT ---
Thanks for all your comments:
[acme at doppio tuna]$ rpmlint /home/acme/git/tuna/rpm/SPECS/tuna.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[acme at doppio tuna]$ rpmlint
/home/acme/git/tuna/rpm/SRPMS/tuna-0.9-1.fc11.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[acme at doppio tuna]$ rpmlint
/home/acme/git/tuna/rpm/RPMS/noarch/tuna-0.9-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[acme at doppio tuna]$ rpmlint
/home/acme/git/tuna/rpm/RPMS/noarch/oscilloscope-0.9-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
oscilloscope.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-matplotlib
oscilloscope.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary Oscilloscope
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.
[acme at doppio tuna]$
I'm just waiting for an authorization for including a short article that
describes the oscilloscope usage to then upload the new .src.rpm.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list