[Bug 226062] Merge Review: libX11

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226062


Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |panemade at gmail.com,
                   |                            |peter.hutterer at redhat.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com>  2009-07-24 06:55:11 EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i686).
koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1497503
- rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM.
libX11.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary libX11
libX11.src: W: strange-permission make-git-snapshot.sh 0775

libX11.i686: W: name-repeated-in-summary libX11
libX11.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0
libX11-common.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized libX11 common data

+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ lx11.pc and x11-xcb.pc file present.
+ -devel subpackage present.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ ldconfig scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Package libX11-1.2.99-2.20090712.fc12.i686 =>
Provides: libX11-xcb.so.1 libX11.so.6
Requires: libX11-xcb.so.1 libX11.so.6 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.2)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0)
libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) libxcb.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH)
+ Package libX11-devel-1.2.99-2.20090712.fc12.i686 =>
Provides: pkgconfig(x11) = 1.2.99.1 pkgconfig(x11-xcb) = 1.2.99.1
Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config libX11-xcb.so.1 libX11.so.6 pkgconfig(kbproto)
pkgconfig(x11) pkgconfig(xcb) pkgconfig(xcb) >= 1.1.92 pkgconfig(xproto)

+ Not a GUI application

Suggestions:
1) Fix rpmlint messages about summary.
2)  follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Timestamps

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.