[Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jun 6 13:34:02 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902





--- Comment #17 from Paul Fox <pgf at laptop.org>  2009-06-06 09:33:59 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> I'm a little disappointed, the script could be more sophisticated IMHO,
> e. g. it could read max brightness from
> /sys/class/backlight/dcon-bl/max_brightness. Take a look at
> http://www.catmoran.com/olpc/#xfcebrvo

i would have thought that a script that doesn't require bash, invokes no
external processes (catmoran's invokes two) would be more sophisticated, not
less.  :-)  i understand your point about max_brightness, but the values i
hard-coded in the hardware, and i see little reason to ask the kernel for the
value, in that case.

> 
> olpc-brightness is being run as root because of the permissions of
> /sys/class/backlight/dcon-bl/brightness, right? Is there no better way? Can we
> use hal to give user write permission?

we could -- in fact, the daemon could simply change the permissions itself. 
are you concerned that users can't change the brightness themselves?  or that
the script runs as root?

> 
> Anyway, testing was positive, everything works as you described. So let's check
> the outstanding issues:
> 
> OK - MINOR: BuildRoot tag
> OK - MAJOR: BuildArch tag
> OK - MAJOR: Requires: hal added
> OK - MINOR: Description: line breaks are at 80 characters
> OK - MAJOR: RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honored
> OK - MAJOR: Timestamps preserved
> 
> I just realized that "BuildArch: %{ix86}" is not a good idea because the
> buildsys will then build for i386, i486, i586, i686 and athlon. Better use 
> ExclusiveArch: %{ix86}

should this still use the macro in that case?

> One last thing: during build I see:
> + make
> fatal: Not a git repository
> fatal: Not a git repository
> fatal: Not a git repository
> fatal: Not a git repository
> fatal: Not a git repository
> 

fixed.

thanks again for your help.


> I wouldn't call this a blocker, but please fix it. 
> 
> 
> olpc-kbdshim-6-2.20090605git98f5b2c.src.rpm is APPROVED
> 
> P.S.: Please cc me if you submit olpc-powerd for review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list