[Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program.

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 22 06:06:43 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246





--- Comment #16 from Jan Klepek <jan.klepek at hp.com>  2009-06-22 02:06:41 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > 1] why do you have download_version different from Version?
> > from specfile:
> > %define  download_version 0.70
> > Name:           shutter
> > Version:        0.70.2
> > Why don't use Version instead of download_version?
> 
> The real version is 0.70.2, but the tarball of source code which author
> provides is shutter-0.70. I do not know why the author do it. Maybe we should
> contract with author and persuade him to correct the version.  
> 

Upstream provides 0.70.2 (
http://shutter-project.org/wp-content/uploads/releases/tars/ )

> > 2] in %install you are creating directory named "0755" in bin/ and share/
> 
> Are there any problems? I think it is OK for us.
> 
install command create this directories, please fix your %install section.
There is no reason to create them at first place.

> 2. modules: It is not a good choice to remove them as I see. If we remove them,
> we will need to create packages for (File::Spec and Proc::Simple). If
> (File::Spec and Proc::Simple) upgrade to new version, it will be not compatible
> with shutter. So I think we should use the perl module which author offers.
> Just like some linux software with static libraries, It can provide the best
> compatibility with their software. 

It is much wise choice to have them as separate packages. It will provide much
more benefit to fedora. And as per my opinion it breaks following rule:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries

I could very hardly imagine that next release of File::Spec and Proc::Simple
will be non-compatible with shutter. We could require specific version of
File::Spec or Proc::Simple packages.
It is same as for Perl-Goo-Canvas or Perl-Gnome2-Wnck.

I have started creating package of File::Spec and Proc::Simple and will submit
them during today to help you.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list