[Bug 532524] New: Review request: jcifs - Common Internet File System Client in 100% Java

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Nov 2 18:00:55 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review request: jcifs - Common Internet File System Client in 100% Java

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532524

           Summary: Review request: jcifs - Common Internet File System
                    Client in 100% Java
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
            Blocks: 163776
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/jcifs.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/review/jcifs-1.3.12-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description:
The jCIFS SMB client library enables any Java application to remotely
access shared files and directories on SMB file servers(i.e. a Microsoft
Windows "share") in addition to domain, workgroup, and server
enumeration of NetBIOS over TCP/IP networks. It is an advanced
implementation of the CIFS protocol supporting Unicode, batching,
multiplexing of threaded callers, encrypted authentication,
transactions, the Remote Access Protocol (RAP), and much more. It is
licensed under LGPL which means commercial organizations can
legitimately use it with their proprietary code(you just can't sell or
give away a modified binary only version of the library itself without
reciprocation).



This package was imported from JPackage

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list