[Bug 532523] Review request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Nov 23 19:13:05 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532523
Steve Traylen <steve.traylen at cern.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |needinfo?
--- Comment #7 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen at cern.ch> 2009-11-23 14:13:03 EDT ---
Hi Mary,
The review looks good, just change the docs to noarch and I'll approve.
Steve
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1825761
yes: rpmlint above.
yes: package name.
yes: spec file name
yes: package guidelines.
yes: GPLv2+ in .SPEC
yes: GPLv2+ in reality.
yes: COPYING file included.
yes: english spec.
yes: legible spec.
yes: source matches upstream.
$ md5sum jarjar-src-0.9.zip ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/jarjar-src-0.9.zip
61825e60d0466e328c7d24a6cef2c643 jarjar-src-0.9.zip
61825e60d0466e328c7d24a6cef2c643
/home/steve/rpmbuild/SOURCES/jarjar-src-0.9.zip
yes: builds (fc13)
yes: build requires sane.
yes: buils on archs - see koji
yes: no locaes.
yes: no ldconfig needed.
yes: no system libs.
yes: not reloc'
yes: no duplicates.
yes: pulls in jpackage-utils to own directories
yes: everything %defatt
yes: cleans everything.
yes: macro use good.
yes: contains code.
yes: java doc in seperate package.
yes: %doc not needed runtime.
yes: no devel package.
yes: no static libs.
yes: no pkgconfig files.
yes: no devel packages.
yes: no .la files.
yes: no gui.
yes: %install cleans itself.
yes: utf8.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list