[Bug 520204] Review Request: aspell5-ro - Romanian dictionary for Aspell

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520204


Garrett Holmstrom <gholms.fedora at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gholms.fedora at gmail.com




--- Comment #1 from Garrett Holmstrom <gholms.fedora at gmail.com>  2010-01-08 17:41:48 EDT ---
I am not a sponsor (or even a packager yet), however here are some informal
comments based on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines

rpmlint reports:
aspell-ro.src:26: W: configure-without-libdir-spec

- This one's OK because it isn't an autoconf-based configure.

aspell-ro.x86_64: E: no-binary
aspell-ro.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

- As far as I know these are OK simply because it's an aspell dictionary
package.

aspell-ro-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package

- I don't think you need a debuginfo package for aspell dictionaries.  If you
add the line "%define debug_package %{nil}" to your spec file it won't try to
build one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.