[Bug 225942] Merge Review: jdepend
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jan 9 08:57:08 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225942
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> 2010-01-09 03:57:04 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> * rpmlint
>
> jdepend.spec:38: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java
> - I don't think this matters
Fixed.
>
> jdepend.spec:53: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation
> - Think we'er using "Documentation" now.
Fixed.
> jdepend.spec:63: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java
Fixed.
> jdepend.spec:70: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> - not needed
Fixed.
>
> jdepend.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
> - but needed here
Fixed.
>
> jdepend.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 35, tab: line 31)
Fixed.
>
> * naming - check
> * NamingGuidelines
> * licensing BSD
> * osi approved? yes
> * included? yes
> * correct mentioned in specfile? yes
>
> specfile
>
> * American English - yes
> * legible - yes
> * ExcludeArch, blocking - na
> * BuildRequires - yes
> * Locales - na
> * shared libraries: ldconfig - na
> * %clean section with rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} - yes
> * macros -
> * sources - check
> * relocatable? Prefix: /usr? - na
> * files and directories
>
> - Guidelines use unversioned directory for javadoc now
>
> * owns all created directories - yes
> * all files listed in %files
> * permissions?
> * deffattr? - yes
> * no .la files - yes
> * .desktop for GUI applications - na
> * no conflicts with other packets - yes
> * permissable content - yes
> * doc - yes
> * large doc in -doc package - na
> * must not affect runtime - yes
> * sane scriptlets
>
> - No longer need:
>
> # for /bin/rm and /bin/ln
> Requires(post): coreutils
> Requires(postun): coreutils
Fixed.
>
> * subpackages with fully versioned dependency -
>
> - Guidelines specify that the javadoc package require the main package
Fixed.
Btw, I've also update to the latest 2.9.1 release.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list