[Fedora-packaging] kernel-module rpm's - final decision?

Tom 'spot' Callaway tcallawa at redhat.com
Wed Mar 2 20:54:39 UTC 2005

On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 22:18 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 13:46 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
>> (Do we need the additional "Provides: kernel-module-openafs",
>> isn't that a given, since the Name: is the same?)
>Right, not needed.
>I see there's no "Provides: kernel-modules" or somesuch, was that left
>out on purpose?

If I'm not mistaken, that was used previously to flag the package as
something that yum/apt/whatever needed to perform nasty hacks on.

If thats all it serves, then lets not use it. I want to fix it in rpm so
we don't need it.

Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list