[Fedora-packaging] X-Fedora vs. X-Fedora-Extra vs. X-Fedora-Extras
Paul Nasrat
pnasrat at redhat.com
Tue Mar 8 17:03:05 UTC 2005
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 18:01 +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:28:11 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers wrote:
> >
> Michael, my point is, if almost everything will be in Extras, what use
> does it have to tag them the same way ? I'd much rather have something
> explicit for that purpose, like:
>
> TopLevel
> SubLevel
>
> Than something that you will use as a default tag but has no practical
> use other than this. In fact, if there are other uses besides the
> TopLevel/SubLevel and the real category, I'd much rather have those
> explicitly defined and named now too :)
>
> Maybe:
>
> Novice
> Advanced
> Expert
>
> would be a useful tag to put on applications. Or
>
> Stable
> Unstable (or Beta)
This sounds like freedesktop.org discussion. Lobbying for stuff should
happen there IMHO.
Paul
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list