[Fedora-packaging] Python Packaging Hints

Toshio Kuratomi toshio at tiki-lounge.com
Mon Sep 19 09:38:00 UTC 2005

On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 10:17 +1000, Alan Milligan wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Could you attach an FC4 spec that doesn't backport to FC3 without
> > modification so we can see the mentioned issue?
> Take rhpl.spec for example.  In order to build this across python
> versions, we need:

Hmmm... Yes; rhpl's Makefiles seem to make some rather problematic
assumptions.  What other packages do you know have similarly fragile
upstream build scripts?

> make PYTHON=python%{pythonversion} PYTHONINCLUDE=%{pythoninclude}
> LIBDIR=/lib

Why the LIBDIR?  That would seems to break things for x86_64 with no
apparent gain.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20050919/f104848c/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list