[Fedora-packaging] Re: python: mixing sitearch and sitelib (was: python noarch vs arch)

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Sat Sep 2 15:47:30 UTC 2006

Stripped off quote from Jesse Keating:
> Due to the way that python works, if any part of a python's module is
> arch specific (sitearch), the entire thing has to go into sitearch.

On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 11:37:54AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 17:23 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > You mean just the way python-elementtree (and thus yum) works exactly
> > that way since FC3?
> > 
> > Yes, that statement is wrong, just log onto a multilib system and
> > check ownership of parts of sitelib. For example on FC5/x86_64:

> > [ examples of packages having parts in both siteliba and sitearch ]
> [ Jesse trying to justify why these packages do so ]

> So I fail to see how these serve as any kind of example.

Just check your statement again. You outruled coexistence of python
modules in both lib and lib64 and there are real-life counterexamples
to that. What's more to not see???
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060902/fd800767/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list