[Fedora-packaging] ReviewGuidelines: What are proper permissions?
Till Maas
opensource at till.name
Tue Sep 19 22:37:05 UTC 2006
Hiyas,
ReviewGuidelines say:
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
I just noticed that there are some files with permissions 0444 on my fc5
system installed, for example manpages:
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 24410 15. Feb 2006 cdrecord.1.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 1229 11. Feb 2006 dos2unix.1.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 1790 11. Feb 2006 hesinfo.1.gz
Are 0444 proper permission bits for manpages / non-executable files?
Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060920/c1cf15ff/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list