[Fedora-packaging] Re: Draft: Init Scripts

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Tue Feb 27 16:56:25 UTC 2007

On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:45:19PM +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Ville Skyttä wrote :
> > And BTW, for what it's worth, it's /etc/init.d, not /etc/rc.d/init.d in LSB - 
> > so it might not hurt to treat /etc/init.d as the "canonical" path in Fedora 
> > wherever it is hardcoded into even though there is the symlink between the 
> > two.
> Argh! I could have sworn I had read the opposite somewhere,

Me, too. Obviously not from the LSB, I wonder where we picked that up?

> and have been changing my spec files ever since. Here too, we need
> to document clearly which one we should use, even though the symlink
> won't be removed anytime soon...

Change them to use %{_initdir} and have redhat-rpm-config's maintainer
fix it. :)
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070227/fd5eaba8/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list