[Fedora-packaging] Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2

Ralf Corsepius rc040203 at freenet.de
Wed Jan 17 04:10:06 UTC 2007

On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 13:45 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> As discussed in today's FPC meeting, I've made some changes to the
> Conflicts Draft Proposal to document some acceptable cases, add some
> additional valid file name conflict workarounds, and fix the wording
> here and there.
> FPC Members: Please vote on this draft via email, so we can get this in
> place well before the Core/Extras merge. As I wrote the draft, I vote
> +1. ;)
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Conflicts

This example is doesn't make sense:

* Move the man pages into different sections in each package (e.g.
man1/myapi.1.gz and man3/myapi.3.gz)

man1 and man3 serve different purposes[1], therefore moving man-pages
from man1 to man3 is not applicable nor advisable.

+1 with the sentence above removed.


[1] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRSHAREMANMANUALPAGES

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list