[Fedora-packaging] Re: paragraph on shipping static numerical libs updated

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Sat Jun 2 19:18:17 UTC 2007

On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 01:59:41PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "PD" == Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> writes:
> PD> Here is an updated version of the paragraph about shipping
> PD> static numerical libs taking into account the comments on the
> PD> first version.
> I also wonder if it would be appropriate to include a statement that
> package submitters should explain in the spec the reason why static
> libraries are being packaged.

I think this is nice OTOH, but difficult to foresee OTOH. Some libs
are quite easy to identify as scientific/numeric consumable, but other
non-numeric ones can also be required for the numerical application.
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070602/f2ee9b50/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list