[Fedora-packaging] Re: paragraph on shipping static numerical libs updated

Jason L Tibbitts III tibbs at math.uh.edu
Sat Jun 2 21:08:32 UTC 2007

>>>>> "AT" == Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net> writes:

AT> I think this is nice OTOH, but difficult to foresee OTOH.

Well, at some point you have to know you need a static library,
because you'll put the necessary bits in the spec to make it happen.
I see no reason a comment explaining the need couldn't be added at
that time.

And if someone doesn't know that the static library is needed, it
probably shouldn't be packaged.

 - J<

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list