[Fedora-packaging] Reviewing an existing package with major changes

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Mon Jan 21 17:54:54 UTC 2008

On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:08:56 +0000
Bruno Postle <bruno at postle.net> wrote:

> I'm planning on updating the hugin package, but there have been so 
> many changes that the spec file is largely rewritten - I've split 
> out a hugin-base sub-package, the build system has changed to cmake, 
> there are now .so libraries etc...
> Should I submit a bugzilla review request even though this is an 
> 'old' package?

At any time you want to have a fresh review done of your package you
should feel free to set the flag accordingly and ask for a new review.
We only currently require a review when bringing a new package in, but
we shouldn't stop folks who want to get a fresh look at their package.

Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20080121/2cd38af1/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list