[Fedora-packaging] Re: Suggested ScriptletSnippets (icon cache) changes
ville.skytta at iki.fi
Sat Feb 14 21:21:26 UTC 2009
On Saturday 14 February 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Does that look good?
Yep, pretty much. I found some things that could be improved, and reworded
the first paragraph.
> Couple questions, in the %postun, there's no || : for the touch. Is
> that intentional?
Yes. Only the final exit statuses of the scriptlets matter here.
> If %posttrans should prove controversial (I don't see a problem but if
> it is) is including the gtk-update-icon-cache call in %post in its
> modified state acceptable to the proposal as a whole?
I'm not sure I understand you correctly. Do you mean that if %posttrans for
some reason is not accepted, just move the g-u-i-c call from %posttrans
to %post? I suppose that would work, but it would result in icons that are
removed on package upgrades left behind in the GTK icon cache. Dunno if
that's a problem at all, but my initial proposal did not have that issue:
More information about the Fedora-packaging