[Fedora-packaging] Is "ascii" a valid package name?
rc040203 at freenet.de
Thu Oct 22 17:40:17 UTC 2009
On 10/22/2009 07:15 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:57:47 +0200, you wrote:
>> Is Fedora supposed to be a "hardly useful" packages cult which adopts
>> any package? Provided the quality of certain packages and how certain
>> reviews are being performed, at least I can't deny this thought.
> There was a request on
OK, it's someone's pony ...
> and because it's a tiny package you may not need a lot of time
> for maintainmence.
> For the naming discussion, because Debian use the same name as
> upstream and Debeian has more packages as Fedora, I see no
> problem to use the upstream package name for it.
> At least, of course I have wrote a mail to upstream fo suggest a
> rename of this package. But until now I haven't got any response.
Are you seriously expecting an answer?
More information about the Fedora-packaging