Why /usr/bin/sperl5.8.6 ?

[Warren Togami]

Does anything actually depend on that existing?  Is there any good 
reason for shipping it this way in both packages?

Warren

Chip Turner wrote:
> We ship perl as /u/b/perl and /u/b/perl5.8.6; it's symmetry!
> 
> Chip
> 
> Warren Togami <wtogami at redhat.com> writes:
> 
> 
>>[perl-suidperl] file /usr/bin/sperl5.8.6 is a setuid binary
>>
>>Anyone have any idea why we ship this in perl-suidperl along with
>>/usr/bin/suidperl?  Without looking at the package, it seems odd to me
>>why we ship that binary with a version-specific name.
>>
>>Warren Togami
>>wtogami at redhat.com
>>
>>--
>>Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
>>Fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com
>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
>>
> 
>