Worrying AVC messages
Anne Wilson
cannewilson at tiscali.co.uk
Wed Jan 24 18:50:29 UTC 2007
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 16:52, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> There were two different types of avc in your email. The first
> concerning postfix should be fixed in the next update. Getting the
> /dev/video1 to come up properly is the other. Something is wrong in
> the way you are telling udev to create these devices, unfortunately I
> have no idea, how to fix.
>
/dev/video1 isn't a problem. There's the usual issue of which order the
video*s are allocated, and I tried to create udev rules to handle this. One
works, one doesn't.
This works:
KERNEL=="video*", SYSFS{model}=="Pixart PAC207-BCA", SYMLINK+="webcam"
and /dev/webcam points to the correct /dev/video*, whichever one matches the
model.
This doesn't - the /dev/DC10+ never gets created:
KERNEL=="video*", SUBSYSTEM=="video4linux", SYSFS{name}=="DC10plus_0_",
SYSFS{dev}=="81:1", SYMLINK+="DC10plus", GROUP="video"
This is a pci capture card. The definintions were taken directly from
udevinfo.
I've read until my eyes closed, without getting any further with this. I can
live with the situation, but I'd love to have it really working. I
appreciate that you are all very busy people, but as I said before, if I can
help, I will.
Anne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/attachments/20070124/e81d0697/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-selinux-list
mailing list