f10 marked packages (was: Volume applet for gnome?)
Reid Rivenburgh
reidr at pobox.com
Sun May 24 19:16:46 UTC 2009
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Michal Jaegermann <michal at harddata.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:21:58AM -0600, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
>>
>> Another potential problem I have is this:
>>
>> % rpm -qa | grep fc10 | wc -l
>> 136
>
> If you install 'yum-utils' then you will find there
> 'package-cleanup' utility. The first check is
>
> package-cleanup --problems
>
> If none are reported then your installation is self-consistent.
> The next one would be
>
> package-cleanup --orphans
>
> If you will see some "orphans", i.e. packages not in F11
> repositories, then you may remove some or all of them. Check for
> "problems" again once you did that.
>
> Assorted packages in F11 repos can be inherited from F10. Quite
> often there is no need to recompile.
Thanks for the reminder about package-cleanup. Unfortunately, I do
have problems. Some I was able to easily resolve, but here's one
tricky one (of about 10 total):
Package qt-mysql-4.5.1-10.fc10.x86_64 requires libcrypto.so.7()(64bit)
I just checked a development mirror site and found this:
qt-mysql-4.5.0-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm
Is it possible that some of my pre-upgrade rpms (when I was using
F10's updates-testing, not rawhide) were newer versions than the F11
ones, and therefore they didn't get upgraded? That's what these
versions seem to suggest. I guess I can force install the F11
versions now and get things in order?
Thanks,
Reid
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list