[fedora-virt] QEMU new Package
glommer at redhat.com
Wed Feb 4 16:23:12 UTC 2009
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 03:51:56PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 13:15 -0200, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 08:41:56AM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > > qemu-linux:
> > I believe qemu-user suits better upstream name usage. Other than that,
> > I think this proposal is sound.
> The reason I suggested qemu-linux is because I think QEMU's existing
> naming sucks :-)
> i.e. system/softmmu == "emulate a full machine" and user == "emulate the
> linux kernel ABI"
> system vs. linux makes it a little more sense, in my book.
I agree with you 150e^7 %. Another example of naming suckiness on upstream is
the fact that "qemu" stands for qemu-system-i386 on whichever platform you're on,
even on a rotten potato.
However, this is a reason for us to go upstream and suggest name changes. In the mean
time, adopting a different name ourselves will just make matters more confusing.
> > Also, there has been a proposal by ajax in #fedora-devel to have a "qemu-native"
> > package, that would install native emu/virt for whatever architecture you're running at.
> > What do you guys think of this?
> As long it's just a Provides as danpb suggests, I don't mind ...
I believe this is a good suggestion because of kvm. Users using exclusively
kvm will probably want to grab native emulation, whatever it is. And for the
record, kvm ppc is completely merged in qemu.
More information about the Fedora-virt