Plone and static content

[Thomas Chung]

On 4/24/07, Thomas Chung <tchung at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 4/24/07, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
> > So Fedora is starting to mature a bit more in size and I wanted to get
> > this ball rolling.
> >
> > Since fedora.redhat.com is now gone the wiki is our official content
> > site.  There's a couple problems with that, performance is an issue and
> > most content on the wiki is developer oriented.  One thing we're working
> > on right now for the F7 release is a simple plone instance for the
> > fedoraproject.org landing page.  Note, the wiki isn't going away, but
> > when users go to fedoraproject.org they'll see more end-user content.
> >
> > My question for you guys is, once FAS2 is done and we get into having
> > more 'official content'.  What do you guys want to do with a plone
> > site?  The doc's guys will have their own site.  Is anyone interested in
> > this project?  The idea is that the 'official' fedora site will be very
> > small.  Having only minimal information for end users and potential
> > contributors.  It would then link to the larger sites like the wiki.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> >     -Mike
>
> Hi Mike,
> Can we see the site in development yet?
> I've been thinking we could use the plone site for
> news/communication/marketing site for fedora end-users. Of course a
> plenty of distribution/project information should be available which
> lead to joining various Fedora Projects including developments and
> testings.

BTW, I really like simply approach such as http://www.gnome.org/
-- 
Thomas Chung
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung