Plone and static content
Mike McGrath
mmcgrath at redhat.com
Wed Apr 25 03:14:32 UTC 2007
Thomas Chung wrote:
> On 4/24/07, Thomas Chung <tchung at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> On 4/24/07, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > So Fedora is starting to mature a bit more in size and I wanted to get
>> > this ball rolling.
>> >
>> > Since fedora.redhat.com is now gone the wiki is our official content
>> > site. There's a couple problems with that, performance is an issue
>> and
>> > most content on the wiki is developer oriented. One thing we're
>> working
>> > on right now for the F7 release is a simple plone instance for the
>> > fedoraproject.org landing page. Note, the wiki isn't going away, but
>> > when users go to fedoraproject.org they'll see more end-user content.
>> >
>> > My question for you guys is, once FAS2 is done and we get into having
>> > more 'official content'. What do you guys want to do with a plone
>> > site? The doc's guys will have their own site. Is anyone
>> interested in
>> > this project? The idea is that the 'official' fedora site will be
>> very
>> > small. Having only minimal information for end users and potential
>> > contributors. It would then link to the larger sites like the wiki.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>> > -Mike
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>> Can we see the site in development yet?
>> I've been thinking we could use the plone site for
>> news/communication/marketing site for fedora end-users. Of course a
>> plenty of distribution/project information should be available which
>> lead to joining various Fedora Projects including developments and
>> testings.
>
> BTW, I really like simply approach such as http://www.gnome.org/
Yeah, this will be extremely simple. Karsten pointed out:
wget -qO- http://fedoraproject.org/ | grep href | wc -l
There's 61 links on the current main page?!?!! holy moly :)
-Mike
More information about the Fedora-websites-list
mailing list