inconsistent download links

[Karsten Wade]

On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 08:38 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> Karsten Wade wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 22:11 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> >> All of the "download" links on this page:
> >> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/
> > 
> > BTW, this site is under the purview of FDP, as a joint-venture with
> > Infra and Websites.
> > 
> >> should refer to http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora.html
> > 
> > s/sh/c/
> 
> 
> Fair enough... sorry if I came in too strong.
> 
> I was looking at all of this from the perspective of someone with little 
> familiarity with Fedora and also trying to keep with the new simplified 
> approach of "less information equals more" :)

Sure!  I was just making it clear that, yes, a decision needs to be made
about what the canonical "get Fedora" URL is we pass around, and no, I
don't think the decision has been made.

Or has it?  Maybe it has. :)

> Why not call it: "Docs" Fedora Documentation?

I just updated HEAD in CVS; that should update the main site, and
most/some mirrors will pick up the content later.  In essence, "Help"
was misleading, why not just call a duck a duck instead of a fowl?

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/attachments/20070530/3947e48b/attachment.sig>