[Fedora-xen] What are the minimal required FC6 packages for Dom0?

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Sat Oct 7 22:56:08 UTC 2006


On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 11:12:00PM +0200, Aryanto Rachmad wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange at redhat.com>
> To: "Aryanto Rachmad" <aryanto at chello.at>
> Cc: <fedora-xen at redhat.com>
> Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 10:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] What are the minimal required FC6 packages for Dom0?
> 
> 
> >
> > Fully-virt just lets you run unmodified operating systems (notably Windows,
> > or older versions of Linux for which there is no Xen kernel available).
> > If you only care about running modern Xen enabled Linux  kernels then
> > you have on need for fully-virt. As a general rule, if there is a paravirt
> > version of your desired OS available, using that will always be preferrable
> > to fullyvirt. The network & disk I/O is much faster in paravirt, and since
> > the kernel is informed when the hypervisor re-schedules it, it can do much
> > more accurate process accounting in the guest. It is basically impossible
> > to do accurate process scheduling in fully-virt, since the guest kernel
> > has no knowledge of the fact that its running under a hypervisor.
> >
> 
> Thanks a lot Dan,
> 
> I am actually planning to use Windows XP on one of the guests. So in this case I can not
> do that, cann't I? But on the other hand, I prefer para-virtualised as it has more
> advantages as you explained.

Yeah, for Windows XP you'll need an Intel-VT or AMD-V  capable CPU.

Regards,
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 




More information about the Fedora-xen mailing list