[feedhenry-dev] Separate APB org or just separate repo

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Craig Brookes <cbrookes at redhat.com> wrote:

> As mentioned by John having a consistent pattern for our services and
> their various pieces (cli, apb, ui) etc needs to be figured out.
>
> The options:
>
> *Single Repo: * We kinda ruled this one out as it unlikely it would work
> well against 3rd part integrations such as 3scale or keycloak.
>
>
> *Repo for each piece: *Lots of overhead and different repos. Off the top
> of my head it would be:
> - repo for any cli piece
> - repo for client sdks (iOS, android, cordova) etc ..
> - repo for APB
>


I'd think this is cleanest - each artifact has it's own repository

In addition, I think we could also move all the apbs to its own GH org.
(aerogearplaybookbundles)



>
> *Single Repo for clients*
> - 1 repo for cli, sdks and (maybe UI too?)
> - 1 repo for APB (not a client but is a deployment mechanism).
>
>
> Any other or better options people can think of?
>
> --
> Craig Brookes
> RHMAP
> @maleck13 Github
>
> _______________________________________________
> feedhenry-dev mailing list
> feedhenry-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-dev
>
>


-- 
Project lead AeroGear.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/feedhenry-dev/attachments/20171213/c775fd30/attachment.htm>