[feedhenry-dev] mobile client or mobile app

[Jason Madigan]

Deep thoughts this early in the week. App is quite a loaded term alright,
particularly in an OpenShift context, so I think Mobile Client may be a
clearer distinction.

Looping in our wordsmith Paul who may have other ideas.

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Craig Brookes <cbrookes at redhat.com> wrote:

> Was thinking about terminology . We have been using the term mobile app,
> but I wonder would it be clearer to use the term mobile client instead.
> The main reason for this is that app can mean a server side component (in
> OpenShift there is the new-app command for example). I think it would make
> a clearer distinction. Another example is around the word build. When you
> do an app build in OpenShift it normally produces a docker image and a
> running server / app. I think using the the term mobile client build makes
> it clearer what is happening.
>
> Just a thought for a Monday morning.
>
> --
> Craig Brookes
> RHMAP
> @maleck13 Github
>
> _______________________________________________
> feedhenry-dev mailing list
> feedhenry-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-dev
>
>


-- 
Jason Madigan
Engineering Manager, Red Hat Mobile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/feedhenry-dev/attachments/20171127/71a3c7c9/attachment.htm>