[Feedhenry-raincatcher] Managers vs Topics

[Niall Donnelly]

Yes, Paulo is exactly right. The fh-wfm-sync module should only be
publishing and subscribing to topics.

That is one of the areas I am intending to address this sprint to remove
this confusion.

Thanks
Niall

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Paolo Haji <phaji at redhat.com> wrote:

> As I understand it, the 'manager' name comes from sync with its data
> managers 'managing a dataset'.
> The managers themselves should ideally communicate through the mediators
> as well, and they do for some events, but there are some direct function
> calls as you could observe.
>
> Managers only come up in the context of sync.
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> I was writing some code and had a question,  The demo application uses
>> managers to bridge the Raincatcher<->front end divide.  However all of the
>> Raincatcher modules (can we change that name?) use topics to communicate
>> with each other via the mediator.
>>
>> Should my front end use the mediator or should I use managers?
>>
>> (As an example see : https://github.com/feedhenry-r
>> aincatcher/raincatcher-demo-portal/blob/master/src/app/workf
>> low/workflow.js).
>>
>> Summers
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Feedhenry-raincatcher mailing list
>> Feedhenry-raincatcher at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-raincatcher
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Feedhenry-raincatcher mailing list
> Feedhenry-raincatcher at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-raincatcher
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/feedhenry-raincatcher/attachments/20170207/37353042/attachment.htm>