[Freeipa-users] Required services are not started after reboot

[Rob Crittenden]

Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> On 08.10.2013 18:43, Tamas Papp wrote:
>>
>> On 10/08/2013 06:33 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>>> Finally, I've managed to install FreeIPA on Fedora 20 without any
>>> errors. I was even able to log in through web UI and make some changes.
>>> Sadly after system reboot, non of IPA related services were started and
>>> now nothing works as expected.
>>>
>>> What services need to be enabled (I need to enable manually) to make ipa
>>> server operational again? I'd be thankful for any links to official
>>> documentation that covers this topic.
>>
>> See:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008306
>>
>>
>> t
>
> Thanks,
>
> It looks like this bug is fixed in fc19 [1] but it's not in fc20 [2]
> (please compare 'Bugs Fixed' sections (I haven't tested it on fc19)).
> How is it possible that same release of freeipa (3.3.2-1) fixes bug
> 996716 in fc19 and not in fc20? I'm currently testing newest available
> rpm on fc20 and this bug still occurs.
>
> I've found that bug 1008306 [3] is more relevant in this case than one
> in FreeIPA. I also have newest 389-ds-base
> (389-ds-base-1.3.2.0-1.fc20.x86_64) package released for fc20 and
> nothing has changed as I mentioned above.
>
> I'm trying to make sens out of this bug & rpm # spaghetti but it's not
> so easy.
>
> [1]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18371/freeipa-3.3.2-1.fc19
>
> [2]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18542/freeipa-3.3.2-1.fc20
>
> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008306

I think this is because the fixed 389-ds package hasn't been built yet 
for F-20.

I think the difference in bugs fixed in bohdi was an oversight. The F-19 
bugs fixed upstream should have been included in the F-20 bohdi (and 
probably the other way around too).

The changes made to IPA for BZ 996716 are basically just cosmetic, to be 
in compliance with packaging guidelines.

rog