[Freeipa-users] Required services are not started after reboot

[Nathan Kinder]

On 10/10/2013 06:48 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> On 08.10.2013 18:43, Tamas Papp wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/08/2013 06:33 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>>>> Finally, I've managed to install FreeIPA on Fedora 20 without any
>>>> errors. I was even able to log in through web UI and make some 
>>>> changes.
>>>> Sadly after system reboot, non of IPA related services were started 
>>>> and
>>>> now nothing works as expected.
>>>>
>>>> What services need to be enabled (I need to enable manually) to 
>>>> make ipa
>>>> server operational again? I'd be thankful for any links to official
>>>> documentation that covers this topic.
>>>
>>> See:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008306
>>>
>>>
>>> t
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> It looks like this bug is fixed in fc19 [1] but it's not in fc20 [2]
>> (please compare 'Bugs Fixed' sections (I haven't tested it on fc19)).
>> How is it possible that same release of freeipa (3.3.2-1) fixes bug
>> 996716 in fc19 and not in fc20? I'm currently testing newest available
>> rpm on fc20 and this bug still occurs.
>>
>> I've found that bug 1008306 [3] is more relevant in this case than one
>> in FreeIPA. I also have newest 389-ds-base
>> (389-ds-base-1.3.2.0-1.fc20.x86_64) package released for fc20 and
>> nothing has changed as I mentioned above.
>>
>> I'm trying to make sens out of this bug & rpm # spaghetti but it's not
>> so easy.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18371/freeipa-3.3.2-1.fc19 
>>
>>
>> [2]
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18542/freeipa-3.3.2-1.fc20 
>>
>>
>> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008306
>
> I think this is because the fixed 389-ds package hasn't been built yet 
> for F-20.
The fix for BZ 1008306 is in the 389-ds-base-1.3.2.0-1.fc20.x86_64 
build.  Are we sure that the issue that is occuring here is related to 
tmpfiles.d not creating /var/lock/dirsrv before dirsrv is started?

Thanks,
-NGK
>
> I think the difference in bugs fixed in bohdi was an oversight. The 
> F-19 bugs fixed upstream should have been included in the F-20 bohdi 
> (and probably the other way around too).
>
> The changes made to IPA for BZ 996716 are basically just cosmetic, to 
> be in compliance with packaging guidelines.
>
> rog
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeipa-users mailing list
> Freeipa-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users