[Freeipa-users] samba vs ipa without kerberos

Christopher Lamb christopher.lamb at ch.ibm.com
Fri Jul 3 11:30:15 UTC 2015


Hi Christoph

have you seen this earlier thread?
https://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-users/2015-May/msg00124.html

I guess as that solution adds some custom fields it would break your
requirement "no schema extensions"., but meet the requirement "user
authenticates with password".

mfg

Chris





From:	Christoph Kaminski <christoph.kaminski at biotronik.com>
To:	FreeIPA <freeipa-users at redhat.com>
Date:	03.07.2015 12:26
Subject:	[Freeipa-users] samba vs ipa without kerberos
Sent by:	freeipa-users-bounces at redhat.com



Hi

it is possible (without extra patch/schema extension) to use samba shares
without kerberos? Possibly is there something like a auth proxy for it? I
mean the user authenticates with a password and the proxy checks it securly
against ipa...
any howtos/docs/ideas?

(have ipa 4.1 and samba 4.1.12 here)

Greetz
Christoph Kaminski
--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project





More information about the Freeipa-users mailing list