[Freeipa-users] samba vs ipa without kerberos

[Christoph Kaminski]

I know this howto already, thats the reason why I've written without schema
extensions

Greetz
Christoph Kaminski

> Am 03.07.2015 um 13:30 schrieb Christopher Lamb
<christopher.lamb at ch.ibm.com>:
>
> Hi Christoph
>
> have you seen this earlier thread?
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-users/2015-May/msg00124.html
>
> I guess as that solution adds some custom fields it would break your
> requirement "no schema extensions"., but meet the requirement "user
> authenticates with password".
>
> mfg
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> From:    Christoph Kaminski <christoph.kaminski at biotronik.com>
> To:    FreeIPA <freeipa-users at redhat.com>
> Date:    03.07.2015 12:26
> Subject:    [Freeipa-users] samba vs ipa without kerberos
> Sent by:    freeipa-users-bounces at redhat.com
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> it is possible (without extra patch/schema extension) to use samba shares
> without kerberos? Possibly is there something like a auth proxy for it? I
> mean the user authenticates with a password and the proxy checks it
securly
> against ipa...
> any howtos/docs/ideas?
>
> (have ipa 4.1 and samba 4.1.12 here)
>
> Greetz
> Christoph Kaminski
> --
> Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
> Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-users/attachments/20150703/04d9771c/attachment.htm>