[K12OSN] K12Linux branding ideas

[Peter Scheie]

Will there be any non-Live Server versions?  IOW, is the 'Live Server' part of 
the name superfluous, since that's the only form it comes in?  Or do you 
envision an 'alternative install' version?  OTOH, the fact that it comes 
almost-ready-to-run out of the box via Live IS a big flashy selling point in my 
mind, so from a marketing standpoint, it may make sense to have that in there.

Peter

Warren Togami wrote:
> Hey folks,
> 
> We may soon have ownership of k12linux.* domains.  We need to decide how 
> we will use the K12Linux brand name.
> 
> In the tradition of K12LTSP, perhaps we should call the installable 
> media spins K12Linux.
> 
> K12Linux Live Server F9 Beta 2
> K12Linux Live Server F9
> K12Linux Live Server F10
> K12linux Live Server EL6
> 
> I suspect LTSP-4.2 based K12LTSP media will survive until EL6 makes a 
> fully functional LTSP5 on long-term supportable EL-base possible. 
> Thereafter K12LTSP will be considered legacy.  Folks could continue to 
> use K12LTSP EL5 if they have not yet upgraded to K12Linux, or if their 
> clients are just too old/slow to work with LTSP5.
> 
> Any better ideas?
> 
> Warren Togami
> wtogami at redhat.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> K12OSN mailing list
> K12OSN at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
> For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>
>