[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [K12OSN] Motherboard Manufacturer Recommendations?

Essential dittos to James.  My "Monorail" Tyan based PII from 1999 is still a great firewall.  I have built all boxes with Tyan mobo's and AMD cpus, until recently.  I like Supermicro, alot, and they provide great hardware.  Just did a dual quad core 16gb ram box with SuperMicro. (it uses only 400w)  For fun boxes, as James said, Abit and Asus rock.  Some people give props to Gigabyte, too, but I have no experience with them.


On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:36 AM, James P. Kinney III <jkinney localnetsolutions com> wrote:
The top board maker by far is Tyan. They are not the least expensive nor
the most expensive. Their boards are typically designed for heavy server

The second place in most respects is Asus. They have a larger variety of
boards than Tyan and that is tailored more toward the desktop. Many of
their models are quite solid and some are really server-duty hardware.

SuperMicro is my third choice maker. I only put it after Tyan because I
have had a SuperMicro board fail (once) and non of my Tyans have failed
(yet). As I have a strong preference for LTSP servers using AMD cpus, I
do not use many SM boards as their line is geared more toward Intel.

Last and certainly not least of what I will use is Abit. They have a
large lineup of quite stable boards that are a good value for the money.
I don't expect them to take the constant abuse of a Tyan, and they
won't. But when a working Abit board can be bought and replaced twice
for the cost of a Tyan board running the same cpu, it boils down to
allowable down time. If a failure is OK, I use Abit. If the system MUST
WORK and/or parts replacement is impossible because of remoteness, Tyan.

Right now a solid system using Athlon X2/Phenom is a very good starter
point for a new small server. Go look at the Asus Crosshair II Formula
AM@/AM2+ board :

On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 11:41 -0400, Henry Hartley wrote:
> These days we have such a huge variety of options that we really
> shouldn't complain.  In the "old days" we had to decide what speed
> Pentium we should get.  Before that, there were even fewer choices.  So,
> I want to build a small server.  It will be for testing purposes and
> will probably go to run a handful of thin clients in my home when I'm
> done.  Since I'm paying for it out of my own pocket, price matters.
> Still, I'm not completely broke yet.  So, I think I want to use a
> dual-core AMD processor but one should be adequate.  I know I want room
> for lots of RAM, although again, this won't be running 20 or 30
> stations, just three to five.  Since it's for testing, and since the
> final product WILL be a larger lab, I want to take a step into the
> 64-bit world.  That narrows things down a little but there are still a
> lot of options.
> So, a very specific question.  Given the above, any motherboard
> manufacturers you would recommend, either to get or to avoid?  If you
> have a specific model you want to recommend, that would be welcome, of
> course.  The reasoning behind any of your thoughts would be most
> appreciated, too, of course.
> --
> Henry Hartley
> _______________________________________________
> K12OSN mailing list
> K12OSN redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
> For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>
James P. Kinney III
CEO & Director of Engineering
Local Net Solutions,LLC

GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics)
<jkinney localnetsolutions com>
Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7

This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

K12OSN mailing list
K12OSN redhat com
For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]