[katello-devel] provider URL: reverted a few changes

[Bryan Kearney]

On 05/20/2011 07:30 AM, Todd B Sanders wrote:
> On 05/19/2011 06:47 PM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
>> This one was my fault. Lemme explain my thinking:
>>
>> If this is just for RedHat providers, then I think that the manifest
>> should have it embedded or it should be coded in the app (config file).
>>
>> Now.. should we support using the same Provider type for upstream
>> candlepins? If so, that negates the idea of the config file.. but may
>> be that we add it into the maniest.
>
> If the katello-instance that you can sync from is equal to the same
> instance that created the manifest, then absolutely I would move to
> embedding this data in the manifest vs the UI or config file.
>
> -Todd
>


OK... I will get this on the Candlepin backlog. As for the second 
question. Do we want to support the following:

1) a Tenant either gets Red Hat Subscriptions from an upstream 
candlepin, or Red Hat. This means there is only on Red Hat provider per 
tenant.

-- bk