[katello-devel] Bundler vs rpm-gems
Petr Chalupa
pchalupa at redhat.com
Wed Aug 22 14:28:13 UTC 2012
We already discussed solution with Gemfile.lock. There are issues.
- You would have to have Gemfile.lock for f16, f17, el62, el63
- You would habe to have Gemfile.lock for production and development
- You will have update it every time when some version of gem or rpm
change in some of f16, f17, el62, el63
It seems to me quite clumsy.
Petr
On 22.08.12 16:14, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 09:49:06AM -0400, Hugh Brock wrote:
>> FWIW, our Gemfile.lock is in git. We don't accept changes to it without
>> patch review, etc. etc. Seems to work reasonably well.
>
> Our first experience was not that good, but truth is, now we do use
> github.com and pull requests. On the other hand, the lock file looks
> very messy. You guys are able to track it all?
>
> The general rule could be - no changes at all except adding new
> dependencies (after discussion on the list of course :-)
>
More information about the katello-devel
mailing list