[katello-devel] Bundler vs rpm-gems

[Dmitri Dolguikh]

On 22/08/12 03:28 PM, Petr Chalupa wrote:
> We already discussed solution with Gemfile.lock. There are issues.
>
> - You would have to have Gemfile.lock for f16, f17, el62, el63
> - You would habe to have Gemfile.lock for production and development
> - You will have update it every time when some version of gem or rpm 
> change in some of f16, f17, el62, el63

Hmmm. What if we bundled dependencies when we are tagging for a specific 
platform (and stripped them when packaging into rpm)? Troubleshooting 
would be quite simple then - we could even look at rhel issues on fedora...

-d

>
>
> It seems to me quite clumsy.
>
> Petr
>
> On 22.08.12 16:14, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 09:49:06AM -0400, Hugh Brock wrote:
>>> FWIW, our Gemfile.lock is in git. We don't accept changes to it without
>>> patch review, etc. etc. Seems to work reasonably well.
>>
>> Our first experience was not that good, but truth is, now we do use
>> github.com and pull requests. On the other hand, the lock file looks
>> very messy. You guys are able to track it all?
>>
>> The general rule could be - no changes at all except adding new
>> dependencies (after discussion on the list of course :-)
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> katello-devel mailing list
> katello-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel