[katello-devel] Bundler vs rpm-gems

[Petr Chalupa]

I didn't go that far for 'bundle install' to be able to install gems as 
on on any of these platforms. But it could be done.

This solution allows you to have one repository. In it would contain all 
gems corresponding with f16 deployment and all development gems.

When you bundle install on non-rpm machine you get same result as on f16 
including development dependencies.
When you bundle install on fedora 16 rpm-gems are used instead of gems 
and same development dependencies are installed.
When you bundle install on rhel rpm-gems are used instead of gems (some 
will be older than on fedora) and same development dependencies are 
installed.

Petr

On 22.08.12 15:39, Dmitri Dolguikh wrote:
> On 22/08/12 02:15 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:10:06PM +0100, Dmitri Dolguikh wrote:
>>>> source 'http://fedorapeople.org/groups/katello/gems/f16'
>>>> #source 'http://fedorapeople.org/groups/katello/gems/f17'
>>>> #source 'http://fedorapeople.org/groups/katello/gems/el6'
>>>> source 'http://fedorapeople.org/groups/katello/gems/dev'
>>> are we developing on all of those???? or simply deploying on those?
>> We should all be able to develop/test on those. Let's say you have
>> Fedora 17 only bug and you need to start it with F17 gems (because you
>> can't reproduce it on your setup).
>>
>> If we are going to generate those gem repos, I'd like to have such a
>> chance. It's for free.
> if active development is happening on all of those, it's going to be a
> problem: those have different versions of gems (and that's not taking
> into account 1.9.3) - I don't think we can manage that using Bundler (in
> fact, that's against Bundler's goals).
>
> We could use platform-specific branches though?
>
> -d
>
> _______________________________________________
> katello-devel mailing list
> katello-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel